简体中文 | English
   
   
Home  |   About Our Firm  | Services  | News and IP Practice  | Honors  | Customer distribution  | Laws  |   Web Links
  Contact Us  
TRANFAN TRADEMARK&PATENT OFFICE

Tranfan Law Office

CHINA HANGZHOU

Address: Room 906, Huawei Building, Building No.1, Sky Wing Business Center, No. 133, Hongtai Road, Shangcheng District, Hangzhou , Zhejiang , 310000, CHINA.

Phone: +86-571-85809900

E-mail: trademark@zjbls.com

WhatsApp/Wechat: +8613136186297

--------------------------------------------------

CHINA NINGBO

Address: Room 1703, 17th Floor, Ningbo Yanxiang Center,No. 1299 Ningchuan Road, Yinzhou District, Ningbo, 315042, CHINA.

Phone: +86-574-89085588

E-mail:tm@zjbls.com

WhatsApp/Wechat: +8613136186297

--------------------------------------------------

 


Position:Home > News and IP Practice > Successful Trademark Review Case of "SANTECO"
News and IP Practice
Successful Trademark Review Case of "SANTECO"

[Case Summary]

 

The "SANTECO" trademark applied for registration by Company H on goods such as Class 7 "Electric Coffee Grinder" and Class 21 "Coffee Cup" has been rejected by the Trademark Office due to the citation of previously registered trademarks such as "Sega Blue" and "Shiji SHI JI". The specific details are as follows:

 

Trademark Comparison:

the applied-for markCategory Seven

cited mark

 

 

 

 

the applied-for markCategory twenty-first

cited mark

 

 

 

We believe that the applied trademarks have a distinctive recognizable part of "SANTECO", and there are significant differences in the composition of words, pronunciation, meaning, and the design style and overall visual appearance between the applied trademark and each cited trademark. Therefore, we suggest that the client actively appeal for reconsideration.

 

 

 

[Result of Trial]

 

The trial for reconsideration has now been concluded, and the result is as follows: the applied trademark is provisionally approved.

 

The Trademark Office, after reexamination, believes that the applied trademark and each cited trademark differ in composition, overall presentation form, etc., and that the relevant public can effectively distinguish them when given general attention. The above trademarks do not constitute similar trademarks, therefore, the applied trademark may be provisionally approved.

 

 

[Case Analysis]

 

Similar trademarks refer to those whose characters in terms of shape, pronunciation, meaning, or the composition of the graphic design, colors, or the overall structure of the combination of elements are similar, and may cause the relevant public to mistakenly believe that the goods originate from the plaintiff's registered trademark or have a specific connection with the plaintiff's registered trademark goods. When judging whether trademarks are similar, it is necessary to follow the principles of overall comparison, comparison of the main parts, and isolation comparison. Generally, the textual part is the main identifying part of a trademark.

 

In this case, the applied trademark is a combined trademark, and the textual part is easy to call out. Compared to the graphic design, consumers' attention is still

Home   |   About Our Firm   |   Laws   |   IP Guide and Forms   |   Web Links
Copyright © 2011 Tranfan Trademark&Patent Office All rights reserved Technical support:ZWKJ

Hangzhou Address:Room 906, Huawei Building, Building No.1, Sky Wing Business Center, No. 133, Hongtai Road, Shangcheng District, Hangzhou , Zhejiang , 310000, CHINA. 

Ningbo Address : Room 1703, 17th Floor, Ningbo Yanxiang Center,No. 1299 Ningchuan Road, Yinzhou District, Ningbo, 315042, CHINA.